Wednesday, November 7, 2007

The Stone Killer (Michael Winner, 1972)

In 1972, Charles Bronson was The Man.



Butt-ugly. Short. Smug. Tough. Bronson was an actor who immediately gave the impression that he mixes scrap-metal into his Maypo in the morning. His movies, by this stage in his career, were simple vehicles designed around Bronson single-handedly killing as many people as there were pages in the script.

THE STONE KILLER is no different.


Director Michael Winner more than lives up to his last name with a film in which Bronson blows away (or runs over) dozens of characters in the brief span of 90 or so minutes.

BUT -- ironically -- surprisingly -- and somewhat disappointingly -- Bronson does NOT perpetrate today’s dummy-death. That doesn’t mean it’s not a corker!



Even if you blinked in the 5 seconds the director allows you to witness this spectacular execution, something supernatural occurs -- the lids of the viewers' eyes are magically pried apart and literally held wide open so as to enable the dummy-death to be seen each and every time it is screened.

CLOSE EXAMINATION

Mafia Don, Martin Balsam, hires a team of Viet Nam Vets to assassinate the heads of the major crime families who will be gathered in one room for a meeting.


The hit team hides under the elevator --


-- rides it up to the meeting room --


-- bursts out --


-- and machine guns the assembled Dons.



One of them jumps up from the table, runs to the window, turns his back to it, faces his attackers and receives a chest-full of hot lead.








In medium-shot the Don falls backwards through the window.



Winner cuts to an exterior long shot of the building, angled up as the Don cartwheels head over heels out the window -- screaming.

The deception is a success! Within a single edit, the actor has fully transformed into an intelligently jointed, weighted and costumed dummy!


The arms extend straight out from the body in a T formation. This has the aerodynamic effect of slowly arresting the cartwheeling motion.


The dummy then settles into a face-down swan dive with the legs bent neatly back 90 degrees at the knees.


The screams cease somewhere around here.


The camera pans downward, gracefully following the death dive. Pinstripes, flapping like wings, the dummy hits the sidewalk with a loud THUMP and small bounce.



Bravo!

THE STONE KILLER © Columbia Pictures
post © Howard S. Berger & Kevin Marr

Monday, November 5, 2007

Hangover Square (John Brahm, 1945)

EFFIGY #1: Bring Your Guy...


To all our friends back in the mother country, we here at DESTRUCTIBLE MAN want to hoist our hearty grogs, chuck our favorite “Guy” onto the fire and wish you all a high and HAPPY GUY FAWKES DAY!


To properly celebrate, we have selected a few choice moments from John Brahm’s masterpiece of melancholy, HANGOVER SQUARE, to kick off the first in our series that will occasionally examine a very special form of dummy: EFFIGY.


And those too lazy to use Wikipedia may ask, “Who is Guy Fawkes?”




Laird Cregar plays George Harvey Bone, a sensitive composer and concert pianist who falls victim to spells under which he fulfills a compulsion to kill.


The film begins with a dummy-death.



Bone, already under the grip of a psychopathic spell soon after the opening frames, stabs an antique dealer to death.


He then proceeds to smash an oil lamp over the dead body -- actually, now a substituted dummy body instead of the actor Francis Ford (director John Ford’s older brother) --


-- and sets it ablaze.


Immolation is the preferred mode of body disposal in this film.


Even George Sanders, the dashing young hero, proclaims, “It’s better this way” instead of trying to rescue poor crazy Cregar from the burning music hall at the film’s climax.


He certainly had no problem darting through the flames when he ushered lovely heroine Faye Marlowe away from Cregar’s side moments before.


In HANGOVER SQUARE, fire is a convenient means of eliminating inconveniences -- historically, literally and metaphorically.




The disposal of strangled music hall singer/strumpet (and obsessive object of Bone’s frustrated affections) Linda Darnell’s shapely carcass proves to be one of the creepiest sequences in 20th Century mainstream cinema.



Bone carries her body, disguised as a “Guy” effigy -- and places her atop the symbolic Guy Fawkes Day celebratory pyre at the center of the Square --


-- left anonymously amidst hundreds of other effigies.


At first it is clearly the actress in his arms --



-- but as soon as Bone is on the streets, the body is wrapped and masked (now a dummy as well?).


That transformation that can only happen in the realm of meta-ciné has taken place in the space of a single edit.

One last thoughtful touch -- images both chilling and poetic:


A woman caught between the world of the living/the dead/the fantastic.


Another soul born to die a dummy’s death.



HANGOVER SQUARE © 20th Century Fox
post © Howard S. Berger & Kevin Marr

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Confessions Of An Opium Eater (Albert Zugsmith, 1962)

Souls For Sale

Fever-dream movie based on the fever-dream writings of opium addict Thomas De Quincy.




Vincent Price (aggressively steered away from stereotype) stars as Gilbert De Quincy, a seaman who, in between opium-induced trip-outs, wiles away his time rescuing victims of human slavery during the San Francisco Tong Wars of the 1800’s and waxing philosophic with the local drug and flesh peddlers.


Director Albert Zugsmith has pondered the nature of existence before -- he produced Jack Arnold’s THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING MAN (1957) and directed PSYCHOPATHIA SEXUALIS... ON HER BED OF ROSES (1966) -- here he ruminates again and, in doing so, pulls out all cinematic stops (including a sterling array of dummy-deaths and dummy-death presentation styles).



Our first clip speaks for itself as the physical tenuousness of existence is visualized with a Freudian flourish and a solid human/dummy switch-a-roo.



The next clip evokes a Chinese proverb that virtually speaks the age-old lament of the dummy.



Zugsmith has the keen vision to underscore the profundity with a second physical substitution -- a live seagull into a dummy gull -- all sutured into the viewer’s realm of acceptance by keeping the deception firmly seated within the unblinking point of view of Vincent Price and a young lady passerby.

Next, De Quincy is knocked unconscious. As if in a waking dream, De Quincy opens his eyes to see a wall of ornate Oriental costumes - inanimate, menacing, mysterious.


De Quincy hangs alongside and opposite more masked costumes (in, synchronously, a confrontational position as well as one that signals an eventual transformation from living man to counterfeit man).


One mask speaks to him - De Quincy responds, attempting to dissuade the obvious visual association with dead meat --


The mask speaks again (remember, masks aren’t supposed to talk -- costumes aren’t supposed to move) -- recognizing that there may be something more to De Quincy than meets the eye...



Zugsmith here pulls off an imaginative reverse deception (or "transformation") --

The walking, talking costume is, in fact --



-- a living, breathing man!

Price’s narration over his De Quincy character’s opium-dream/nightmare states quite bluntly the thoughts/concerns that would befall a cinema dummy, something De Quincy is all too preoccupied with with becoming...



Zugsmith utilizes the gamut of montage and optical tricks to forge the metaphoric associations between the living and the dead/the living and the inanimate/the living and the fantastic.

He throws everything in -- from what appears to be stock footage from Bert I. Gordon films to a disembodied, crawling Paul Blaisdell alien hand lifted from Edward L. Cahn’s INVASION OF THE SAUCERMEN (1957)!

The dream/nightmare continues and concludes with De Quincy’s dreaded/inevitable transformation into something other than “alive” or “dead” in perhaps what is one of the most bold and inventive dummy-deaths ever perpetrated on film.



The immaculate deception is three-tier:
1) First stage is the falling De Quincy in medium long shot.
2) This is followed by the replacement of actor Vincent Price by a stuntman with his face carefully hidden by his cap.
3) The effect is finished off by a seamless substitution of “dummy” for stuntman -- in this unique instance, the dummy is an optically manipulated silhouette photo cut-out!

What Zugsmith ultimately accomplishes with CONFESSIONS OF AN OPIUM EATER, wholly aside from the “intentional” or “superficial” objectives of the narrative, is the construction of an ode to the cinema dummy -- a sympathetic tone poem that lies somewhere snugly nestled between tribute and elegy.

post © Howard S. Berger & Kevin Marr